- About Us
- Easy Access Summaries
- Site Map
- Contact Us
The Performance of junior doctors in applying clinical pharmacology knowledge and prescribing skills to standardised cases
|Title||The Performance of junior doctors in applying clinical pharmacology knowledge and prescribing skills to standardised cases|
|Publication Type||Journal Article|
|Year of Publication||2010|
|Authors||Harding, S, Britten, N, Bristow, D|
|Journal||British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology|
|Number of Pages||606|
AIMS Recent studies suggest a worryingly high proportion of final year medical students and new doctors feel unprepared for effective and safe prescribing. Little research has been undertaken on UK junior doctors to see if these perceptions translate into unsafe prescribing practice. We aimed to measure the performance of foundation year 1 (FY1) doctors in applying clinical pharmacology and therapeutics (CPT) knowledge and prescribing skills using standardized clinical cases. METHODS A subject matter expert (SME) panel constructed a blueprint, and from these, twelve assessments focusing on areas posing high risk to patient safety and deemed as essential for FY1 doctors to know were chosen. Assessments comprised six extended matching questions (EMQs) and six written unobserved structured clinical examinations (WUSCEs) covering seven CPT domains. Two of each assessment types were administered over three time points to 128 FY1 doctors. RESULTS The twelve assessments were valid and statistically reliable. Across seven CPT areas tested 51–75% of FY1 doctors failed EMQs and 27–70% failed WUSCEs. The WUSCEs showed three performance trends; 30% of FY1 doctors consistently performing poorly, 50% performing around the passing score, and 20% performing consistently well. Categorical rating of the WUSCEs revealed 5% (8/161) of scripts contained errors deemed as potentially lethal. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that a large proportion of FY1 doctors failed to demonstrate the level of CPT knowledge and prescribing ability required at this stage of their careers. We identified areas of performance weakness that posed high risk to patient safety and suggested ways to improve the prescribing by FY1 doctors.
|Practical Implications|| |
A large proportion of the FY1 doctors are unable to perform at an appropriate level of ability in relation to clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.
|Lay Summary|| |
Errors are common in all healthcare settings. Over 9% of patients admitted to hospital are harmed by error. Whilst error can occur at any stage of the medicine-use process, prescribing errors by GPs are the most common type.